A WEALTH OF TALENT IN WASHINGTON COUNTY

 

“The meaning of life is to find your gift. The purpose of life is to give it away.”

— William Shakespeare

I was recently on a search committee to assemble a “dream team” of independent individuals to run for the Government Study Commission in the general election on November 2. This commentary will not focus on the Study Commission or the Row Office debacle or the pandemic. During our committee discussions, the array of talented individuals who live and work in Washington County overwhelmed me. Our county is truly a unique community that has reason to be proud of its citizens and their accomplishments.

What is most evident when one takes inventory of our local leaders is the number of qualified women who are responsible for all aspects of Washington County’s, political, legal, social and economic enterprises. While not quite the Amazon community of Greek mythology, Washington County women match their counterparts in skills and experience. Women are leaving their imprint on every endeavor throughout the community.

A few examples will highlight my point. At the head of the female pack is County Commissioner Chairman Diana Irey Vaughn. She has grown into her position as the most visible political figure in Washington County. While I often disagree with her conservative philosophy, there is no denying that she is willing to govern in a non-partisan fashion to improve Washington County. Her appointments to County Offices including Chief Clerk, Human Services and the law department, among others, have been women.  Most of the officials in the county’s clerical Row Offices are also women.

In the Washington County Court of Common Pleas, Judges Valerie Costanzo, Traci L. McDonald and retired Judge Katherine B. Emery continue the tradition of females in the judiciary.   At the Washington County Bar Association, Director, Kathy Sabol has transformed the WCBA  into a dynamic organization, often singled out as among the best in the Commonwealth. The WCBA is comprised of 480 attorneys and Judges, and 25% of its members are women.  Many of them contribute to organizations throughout the county.

Betsie Trew has served first as Executive Director and now as President  & CEO of the Washington County Community Foundation since 1998. Under her leadership, the assets of the Foundation have grown from less than $250,000 to more than $50 million. One of her goals is to help women advance through the ranks of nonprofit organizations and philanthropic giving. The present board of directors of WCCF includes eight dynamic women, all dedicated to helping those in need.

No local institution is more challenged and yet more important to the wellbeing of Washington County than our own Observer Reporter. No woman works harder than Executive Editor Liz Rogers.  Her staff insures that we receive a print newspaper each morning.  Ms. Rogers joined the paper in 1982 and worked her way “up the ladder” before assuming her present demanding responsibilities.  In addition to the OR, she oversees two other daily publications. In an era of reduced readership followed by major staff reductions, Washington County is among the few privileged communities still receiving a daily print newspaper.

In the field of education, women rule in Washington County. Until recent retirements, both Washington and Jefferson College and California University had female presidents. Many school district superintendents, principals, school board members and teachers are women.

In the area of nonprofit human services organizations, women abound in Washington County. The Drug and Alcohol Commission, Citizens Library, Teen Outreach, Commission on Aging, Food Bank, Communities Health Services, Literacy Council and the Symphony all have women directors or presidents. There are many other examples of dedicated female Washington County leaders who help insure that the health and welfare of our citizens remains in caring, competent hands.

While I have chosen to highlight female leadership within the county, of course many exceptional men have dedicated their careers to local public service as well. For all who make a commitment to serve, the pay is meager, and the hours are long.  The number of appointed local leaders who are at the top of their professions and yet decide to remain in Washington County is astounding. Many of them could easily leave for higher paying, more prestigious positions in larger communities.

At the municipal level of county government (mayors, supervisors, and council members), community volunteers (firefighters, nonprofits, schools and religious organizations) and commerce (business owners and their employees) are hundreds of Washington County residents who care deeply about their community. Few of these individuals receive the accolades they deserve.

Volunteer activities are especially noteworthy for providing a network of relationships and communications that influence good government. Without them giving freely of their time, Washington County would be a far less desirable place to live and work.

The more engaged communities are collectively, the healthier they become.   One of many examples is the willingness of Commissioners Diana Irey-Vaughn and Larry Maggi to let the voters decide on our form of local government at the general election on November 2.  This process is participatory, accountable, transparent, efficient, inclusive and is one that respects the rule of law.

Helen Keller once said: "The greatness of a community is most accurately measured by the compassionate actions of its members."  The local leaders and volunteers of Washington County, many with an impressive feminine footprint, give meaning to this thought for all of us.

 

POLITICAL POLARIZATION IS CAUSING THE BREAK-UP OF SOCIAL TRUST

Social trust is defined as trusting strangers we encounter in our day-to-day lives to follow certain social norms or fundamental moral expectations. With experience, we come to beleive that others will perform their appointed tasks with integrity and will not steal from us, not lie to us and not defraud us. Social trust is the glue that permits 333 million Americans to live together in a complex, diverse community. Unfortunately, in today’s society, many believe that social distrust of long established institutions and of our fellow citizens is the greatest threat to democracy in our nation.

Factors such as political corruption, racial/ethnic differences and economic inequality have always threatened social trust. What is new is the degree to which political polarization has also become a threat to social distrust, making it impossible for a healthy democracy to function.

Every day we observe out of control political polarization in action on cable news. On July 27, 2021, MSNBC and CNN were highlighting the emotional testimony of the capital police at the first Congressional hearing convened to determine the facts behind the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol. The witnesses described deadly attacks against them precipitated by the words and actions of then president Donald Trump.

At the same time, FOX NEWS and NEWSMAX were accusing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of causing the Capitol riot. They also featured segments attacking the Justice Department for ignoring the criminal rights of the Capitol rioters, who were labeled political prisoners by the commentators. 

These two political views could not have been further apart in addressing an important national issue. Neither political tribe trusts the other to present the facts accurately or to understand the other’s position. What is new and frightening is that we not only distrust politicians from the other party, we distrust those who voted for the other party.

As evidence that political polarization has a growing negative impact on social trust, consider three necessary careers in America that have been transformed from non-controversial employment into partisan lighting rods. Two years ago working as a public health administrator, an election official or a middle school history teacher guaranteed that one could perform a mundane public function while remaining out of the public eye. Since the pandemic, all three positions have been vilified through political polarization, thereby increasing our social distrust.

Public health was the first occupation to be politicized.  In the early months of the pandemic, Rick Bright, the former director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, was removed from his federal position when he rejected pressure by Department of Health and Human Services officials to make hydroxychloroquine, touted by President Trump as a possible COVID-19 treatment, "widely available." More recently, a Missouri county health director left her job because of threats she received over measures put in place to curb the coronavirus pandemic, including a mask mandate. There are many other examples of trust in conscientious public health employees being challenged for partisan political motives.

Next to come under the public spotlight were state and local election officials. This occurred after the former president, while still in office,  attacked these government employees for refusing to disobey court orders and decertify election results. Public confidence in our elections often comes down to trust in nonpartisan election administrators. Since the 2020 election over 145 bills proposed by Republican state legislatures would reassign various powers of election officials to highly-partisan legislatures. These “legislative seizures” could threaten social trust by allowing elected lawmakers to overturn the will of voters and determine their own preferred winners of elections.

Lastly, public school history teachers recently became the political target of political polarization. Many educators want to present a balanced view of the history of American slavery, reconstruction, the Jim Crow era and slavery’s continuing impact on racism. Many parents who follow Republican talking points find this view of American history offensive. They are fighting to prevent this curriculum from being taught in the public schools, thereby perpetuating distrust in America’s story.

What is to be done to end this cold civil war we are waging against one another that has disintegrated social trust?  Primarily, we must confront the emotional urge to interpret all actions by the other side, political and non-political, as misguided. Thankfully, most social interactions are apolitical. We must not let our communities devolve into separate enclaves where citizens only live, work, shop and educate their children with members of their own political affiliation.

The one bright spot in promoting social trust has been the economy. Despite unprecedented high levels of political polarization, trust in capitalism and the American financial system has never been higher. After the recession, the progressive economist Joseph Stiglitz was quoted as saying: “It is trust more than money that makes the world go round.”

The supply of money has more than doubled since the recession and yet gold hording and other signs of economic mistrust are minimal. Economic expansion is fueled by trust in everything from on-line restaurant reviews to dating apps, car sharing and home sharing.

At its core, social distrust is sustained by the inability of many to accept a non-white majority in a country that once enslaved black people. We can only hope that this multi-generational prejudice can be offset by the move toward an open, sharing economy that views diversity as an asset.