The two most
important words the day after the election will be sacrifice and
compromise. These two principals must
quickly mutate from campaign unmentionables to rallying cries to avoid another
crisis. The fiscal cliff will send us
reeling into another recession unless the country comes together under its
political leadership to make tough choices.
This must be done by a lame duck Congress and the President at the end
of the year no matter who takes the oath of office in January.
Our political
campaigns, particularly the presidential contest, have become a feel good
fantasy based on: 1) positions along strict ideological lines to keep intact
each parties’ base (no compromise) and 2) speeches on how each candidate will
make us better off than the other guy, to capture independents (no sacrifice). It is ironic how these two words, which are
truly the lifeblood of a democratic republic, are conspicuously absent during
the long election season. American voters do not want to be told the truth
during campaigns. They want their
selfish addictions fed with “campaign-crack” and refuse to face the inevitable
rehab which includes higher taxes and lower benefits. Interestingly, this is not true in Europe,
where even the socialist candidates, who have been winning elections of late,
recognized the need to discuss austerity measures to balance budgets and the
need for compromise with other political parties.
After the voters
have spoken we can all blink, shake off the sound bite hangover, and the
fantasy will disappear. Decision making,
similar to four years ago when the world’s economy was falling apart, can again
be based on fundamental economic principals and sound political policy. Conservatives will get a good measure of
austerity and deficit reduction.
Liberals will receive progressive tax rates, with those who have more
paying their fare share. The whole
shebang will be disguised so that the compromise does not look like either side
“gave-in.” In this way, when the political
rutting season begins anew three years from now, each candidate can claim their
pockets were picked by the other.
Post election,
sacrifice will enter the discussion and become a positive image. There will be more talk coming from our
political leaders about “what we can do for our country” and less about “I
built that without your help.” Instead
of the election message that stresses giving up hard earned rewards to help
shiftless welfare recipients, sacrifice will be framed in terms of our
children, our elders and neighbors.
Giving back will be patriotic again so that the next generation has
something solid to build on to keep the dream alive. Like compromise, sacrifice will be a fleeting
thought as the next election cycle approaches.
Hopefully enough will be done in the time allotted to make a difference.
No comments:
Post a Comment