As winter gives
way to spring, I continue to wonder, what is the connection, psychological or
otherwise, between humans and the compulsive need to feed the birds? Almost every retired individual I know and
many others develop a strong affection for these hardy creatures that will
appear in our backyards when some seed is offered. From several blocks away, our properties on
South Wade in East Washington sound like an aviary, if we have all filled our
feeders. Favorite bird photos show up in
this newspaper with great frequency.
This phenomenon
appears to cross all political and economic boundaries and somehow fills an
important niche in our lives. We spend
more than $3 billion a year on food for birds, and $800 million a year on bird
feeders and other accessories.
Many of us are not avid bird watchers and
would never consider getting up at the crack of dawn to find them in the
field. We prefer viewing from porch
windows with a cup of coffee and the morning paper. Like serious birders, seeing a rare species
in a place that it is not normally seen is grounds for celebration, but only if
the event happens on our terms of comfort and space. We have not been able to control our children
or our retirement accounts, so why not the daily visit of nuthatch and finch.
I sometimes fear
we may alter migratory habits by offering the avian community an easier
domestic alternative when the leaves start to fall. Such was the fate of Canadian geese that no
longer fly south because of viable food sources around golf courses and manmade
lakes. Moreover, ornithologists believe that bird feeding interferes with
ecological processes, causes malnutrition, facilitates the spread of disease
and increases the risk of death from cats, pesticides, hitting windows and
other causes. Of course, none of this
impacts our desire to provide a feeding frenzy and enjoy the spectacle.
Some of us welcome
squirrels and deer to the show, but most try to exclude all mammals as
interlopers. It is birds we want and all
types of contraptions will be employed to exclude the others. Raptors are acceptable, even though our
feeders have provided the stage for the killing grounds. After all, nature is nature and the swoop of
a red tail hawk is fine entertainment.
Earlier this
winter, I spent some time trying to film a blue jay and red cardinal fighting
over the same peanut, thinking it would make a great political statement for
the election. Unfortunately, my avian
friends were showing more compromise skills than Congress and it was not to be.
One wonders, who is really in control of this
feeding enterprise. Research has shown
that thousands of years ago, dogs and cattle were pulling the evolutionary
strings as they charmed humans into providing a free ride, through
domestication. Maybe the birds are on to
something and we are the ones being coaxed into buying the most expensive
sunflower seeds to dispense on even the most blustery of winter days. Heated bird huts anyone?
No comments:
Post a Comment