On a recent summer evening, my wife was busy page-turning
our copy of the weekly New Yorker magazine. Like many of us, the
cartoons were the main attraction with occasional stops at articles that grabbed
her attention.
She was reading a piece reprinted and reviewed to
commemorate the 1925 Scopes trial, first written one hundred years ago by the
magazine’s reporter who was in attendance. This well-publicized Tennessee criminal
trial focused on the illegality of teaching evolution in public schools.
As we discussed the article, it suddenly occurred to me how
divisive the subject of evolution has been in the American cultural wars. I also
learned that new scientific studies highlight how our understanding of
evolution continues to “evolve” as new discoveries are made.
Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace were both
English naturalists who independently developed the theory of
evolution. Darwin’s publication of The Origin of Species in 1859 turned
all of biology and theology upside down. Previously, geologists and paleontologists made a compelling case that
life had been on Earth for millions of years, that life had changed over time,
and that many species had become extinct. It was the genius of both Darwin and
Wallace to show how all this evidence favored the evolution of a species from a
common ancestor. They offered a plausible mechanism by which life might evolve.
This process Darwin called natural selection.
Darwin and
Wallace each deduced that if a species had some trait that helped it to
withstand the elements or to reproduce more successfully, it might leave more
and stronger offspring behind. These traits seemed to become more common in subsequent
generations.
According to
the Berkley University, History of Evolutionary Thought, The Origin
of Species was one of the most influential scientific books of all time. The
authors go on to explain, “Yet it took years for its full argument to take
hold. Within a few decades, most scientists accepted that evolution and the
descent of species from common ancestors were real. But natural selection had a
harder time finding acceptance. In the late 1800s many scientists who called
themselves Darwinists actually preferred different explanations for the way
life changed over time. Not until the discovery of genes and mutations in
the twentieth century was natural selection not just attractive as an
explanation, but unavoidable.”
Theologians initially believed
that Darwin’s theories were a serious challenge to traditional religious
understanding of the creation of the world. According to the Pew Research
Report, in 1925, when the Scopes trial captured the attention of the nation,
there was no public polling on how many Americans believed in evolution.
However, Pew points out that, “by the early 1920s evolution had become one of
the most important wedge issues in the cultural divide because the debate had
taken on a pedagogical dimension. Students throughout the nation, now studied Darwin’s ideas in public school biology
classes.”
In 1925, the Tennessee Butler Act
prohibited the teaching of evolution in public schools. The A.C.L.U. published a newspaper ad
offering to defend anyone who would test the constitutionality of this new
state law. A substitute high-school teacher, John Scopes, agreed to become the
defendant in order to stage a criminal case. Clarence Darrow represented the
defendant and William Jennings Bryant, the state of Tennessee. Scopes was
convicted and ordered to pay $100 dollars. (Bryant died five days after the
verdict.) All appeals failed. The
Tennessee Butler Act prohibiting the teaching of evolution was not repealed
until May 17, 1967.
Today, according to
Pew Research, roughly eight-in-ten U.S. adults (81%) believe humans have
evolved over time. However, around four in ten white evangelical Protestants
continue to maintain that humans have always existed in their present form.
Wikipedia
informs us, “As of 2024,
all fifty U.S. states and the District of Columbia include the teaching of
evolution in their public-school science standards, while none teach
intelligent design. Creationism can be discussed in non-science classes, such
as philosophy or comparative religion.”
Now that the theory of evolution has been widely accepted,
in what respects does it continue to evolve? The Evolution of Imperfection
by Laurence Hurst, a professor of evolutionary genetics at the University of
Bath, provides some fascinating answers. Hurst offers solid science that
evolution does not always work for the good of the species. Evolution is not
designed to correct all of our faults and imperfections.
Some examples include our inability to synthesize vitamin C
because our ancient ancestors had an overabundance of fruit. High blood
pressure during pregnancy helps the fetus absorb nutrients but is dangerous to
the pregnant mother.
The relatively small population of humans enhances the influence
of chance in evolutionary changes. This leads to both the accumulation of
unnecessary DNA and unhelpful mutations. Evolution is not a process of good or
bad. It is a process of trial and error that does not always produce the best
result in modern man.
For those that are seeking a deep dive into the science,
Hurst does an excellent job of reviewing modern genomics, the study of an organism’s
DNA. He explains how mutations happen, why they persist, and why humans hold a
large reservoir of troublesome genetic errors.
Evolution is a process that is always rolling the dice as
our species advances. Humankind did not
start out biologically perfect and is far from it now.
No comments:
Post a Comment