The graying of America should be added to the litany of
problems facing the nation. Since 1960, the median age of Americans has risen by
nearly nine years. It now stands at 38.3 years from the earlier 29.6. More recently, from 2010 to 2020, the
65-and-over population increased by an astounding 34 percent.
Baby boomers
are convinced we will be around for decades to come. If we are correct, the safety
net of Social Security and Medicare that were designed for a population with
much less longevity will be pushed to its limits.
In many
respects it is a worse challenge for spouses, siblings, children, and for
organizations that provide housing/long-term health care for the elderly. According to the website shortlister, approximately 70 per
cent of Americans aged 65 and older will require some form of long-term
care during their lifetime.
As a card-carrying member of the baby boom generation, I am not only
interested in the financial burden we will impose on the nation, but on the
legacy our generation is leaving for those we love. To help me better frame the
issues, I recently discovered a book, The Aftermath: The Last Days of the
Baby Boom and the Future of Power in America, by Philip Bump.
Bump is a columnist for the Washington Post who is known for his nerdy immersion
in charts and graphs to prove a point. His book keeps this tradition alive (128
charts in total) as he attempts to overcome pure speculation with some hard
facts. His thesis is that the downward
shift of our population’s center of gravity, the national political climate,
and the frustrations of younger Americans will continue to overlap and to
explain many of the country’s fissures.
He believes that, “A large generation of boomers, used to accruing and
defending its power through sheer scale is watching that power crumble…We’re
now living through something exceptional, an historic disruption of an American
empire.”
The Aftermath is
a sweeping assessment of how the baby boom created modern America. Bump covers
all of the important contributions and colossal failures. He believes there are
three conduits for power: culture, economics, and politics. He concludes that the cultural shift is all
but over, heavily centered on the young.
He sees economic power dependent on how much it costs to maintain older
baby boomers, along with the housing market, student debt, and the ability of
the next generation to generate enough tax revenue to care for the elderly.
Regarding politics, when the book was written, Trump’s second term was
not yet part of the equation. Bump concluded in 2023 that our generational
shift lies at the heart of the current national malaise. Bump posits that the
important factors are the direction of political leanings and racial diversity
in the electorate.
It is interesting that Bump finds that in the near future, America will
look more like Florida—older, less white, conservative. In a few years, millennials will come into
their own and begin demanding a bigger piece of the economic pie. Bump is not
sure whether they will be battling their parents to cut senior benefits, or battling
the robots seeking their jobs.
In order to escape Bump’s charts and graphs, I decided to seek input
from two millennial men with young families. The first, “Noel,” is a father and
spouse in suburban Minneapolis, Minnesota. Noel is a politically engaged white-collar
progressive. The second is “Joshua” with a young family in Somerset County,
Pennsylvania. Joshua is a local banker who remains very close to the farming
tradition of his father’s family. He is a conservative with strong libertarian
leanings and an active participant in his community.
Noel has strong views on where his parent’s generation failed the
country. “The boomer generation was raised with a mentality of individual
advancement, rather than building the community up. This allowed cracks in the
American foundation.” His theme of self-interest over community continues. “I
see great wealth gained by a few Fortune 500 store fronts rather than space for
local entrepreneurs.” He has a question for the boomer generation. “What and
for whom were you fighting for?” He believes his generation must understand the
answer to make peace with boomers and to move forward.
When it comes to his young children, Noel is concerned about the type of
world they will inherit. He sees as a main parenting goal to “show them that
each of their choices has an impact.” The goal for himself is to be part of his
neighborhood and to understand how those with different views can live together.
Given his community and upbringing, Joshua has a more traditional,
conservative orientation. There is one regret about his childhood, “I would
change the pace of my early life and slow it down, enjoy the simple things.”
His views on the future are positive with the caveat, “I put no faith in
government to fix the problems of our country.” Joshua wants no part in cradle-to-grave
benefits. He believes it is his responsibility to “work hard, maintain a
positive attitude and to forge a path of success.” Joshua would place serving
God and others ahead of self-serving motives.
Somehow, I feel I received a better sense of “what comes next” from Noel
and Joshua than from Bump’s graphs and charts. One thing is for sure; it will
be complicated.
No comments:
Post a Comment